
|

International Film Distribution:
International Film Distribution:
Striking a Deal in the Global Market
By Brandon A. Blake
General Considerations
Contractual problems arise generally from the complex nature of the
distribution process and the difficulty of overseas transactions. American
distributors have a hard time ensuring that foreign exhibitors will report
box office revenues honestly, return films upon completion of the exhibition
term, render prompt payment and generally abide by the terms of the contract.
These problems are exacerbated by the use of foreign subdistributors which
allow the subdistributors greater opportunity to distort revenues and costs.
Moreover, American producers may not be able to insure that distributors
do not pre-release films on video before the theater market has peaked.
In order to guarantee payments and adherence to the producer’s or domestic
distributor’s expectations, the distribution contract must be clearly specified.
Explicit definitions of all rights and obligations of the distributor,
exhibitor, and other parties should be defined. In addition, agreements
should include specified delivery and payment procedures, and assign all
rights to censorship, artistic control, and promotion as clearly as possible.
The focus should be placed on collection of compensation by means of a
letter of credit or personal guarantees, protective currency clauses to
allow for adjustments to prevailing exchange rates, and automatic reversion
of rights in the event of a material breach by the foreign party.
There should also be some room for creative contracting to mold an agreement
in light of the local market trends and viewer preferences. For example,
producers should be knowledgeable about whether the territory’s audience
favors big action films or independent films, video or theatrical release,
and should tailor the contract to benefit from these sources of income.
Moreover, general cultural, political, and economic factors must also be
considered in contracting. For instance, in 1997, Chinese officials temporary
halted dealing with Sony Pictures and MGM after taking offense at their
respective films "Seven Years in Tibet," "Kundun," and "Red Corner"due
to their political content.
Tips for Negotiation: The Distribution Contract
Title. The feature length theatrical motion picture’s name should
be identified by its American title and any other title it had been given
for foreign distribution. If the agreement includes several pictures, some
of which have not been produced, then these unproduced pictures should
be described as specifically as possible with tentative titles or other
properties.
Territory. The territory should be specified as clearly as possible
to avoid future disputes. For example, a French language license could
not only include France but other French speaking areas such as Monaco,
the French-speaking area of Andorra, Quebec and other French speaking former
colonies. Additionally, territories should be defined within political
borders and exclude foreign embassies, military and governmental installations,
oil rigs and marine installations, airlines-in-flight, and ships-at-sea.
Sometimes territories that are politically defined will be under a different
territory in a distribution contract due to language differences. For example,
Puerto Rico is a U.S. commonwealth but it is included under the Spanish
speaking Carribean islands for film distribution purposes. Therefore, territories
in a foreign distribution agreement must be specified not only by political
borders, but by the linguistic requirements of each territory.
Term. The term of a foreign distribution contract is similar
to domestic agreements, usually from seven to ten years. However, if a
picture is successful, the producer will require a shorter term to allow
for re-licensing or re-release. The producer will want a short term so
that the rights can revert back to the producer and become part of his
or her film library. On the other hand, if a large advance is paid, the
distributor will want a longer period to allow it to recoup its advance.
Rights Granted. Typical rights granted to the distributor in
a distribution agreement include the rights to distribute, advertise, and
market the film, using trailers, excerpts and clips. In the foreign distribution
context, distributors generally have the right to dub and subtitle the
film. Additional rights may be granted to the distributor for an effective
distribution campaign in the territory. Such rights include usage of any
music or composition in the film, publishing rights to the synopsis of
the film, and, in rare circumstances, editing rights, if the distributor
can enhance the prospects of the picture by editing it to local audience
tastes. Foreign independent distributors are more likely to have the knowledge
and skill to edit the film according to local tastes. Local distributors
can give producers the individualized attention and cater to the local
audience. Thus, adding editing rights to agreements with local distributors
may be advantageous for producers.
The granting of editing rights depends on the relative bargaining power
of the producer and distributor. The distributor may only get editing rights
subject to a powerful producer’s approval. Another additional right that
may be granted is the distributor’s right to bring suit against third parties
for unauthorized use, copying, release, distribution, exhibition or performance
of the picture in the territory. Granting power of attorney rights to the
distributor will not only motivate the distributor to protect the rights
of the picture but is also more convenient for enforcement purposes because
of the distributor’s location and access to the territory.
Since rights granted to the distributor are broadly defined, the producer’s
rights must be expressly granted. The producer’s rights include, among
others, television, pay TV, home video, soundtrack album, music publishing,
merchandising, and novelization. The rights for television, pay TV, and
video are usually restricted by holdback periods, which require producers
to wait a period of time before distribution in these forms, in order to
protect the distributor against competition. Holdback periods are usually
several years for television and pay TV, and less than a year for video.
Cross-collateralization. Another important clause in a foreign
distribution contract is the no cross-collateralization clause. In a multi-territory
or multi-film distribution agreement, cross-collateralization is usually
prohibited, meaning that each picture must stand on its own and the distributor
may not offset gains and losses from different territories or pictures.
One exception to this clause applies to unselected pictures and is explained
below.
Unselected Pictures. In multiple film deals, the distributor
may have the right to select which picture to distribute and its time of
release. Once the distributor has chosen which films to release, the parties
should provide for a period in which the film must be released after it
is properly delivered according to the contract. Usually theatrical release
is required as soon as possible, or no later than six months, to capitalize
on the publicity and "word of mouth" from the film’s release in the United
States.
Unselected films can be released if there is a provision in the agreement
for the producer to compel distribution of unselected films. In that case,
the distributor would negotiate for the producer to reimburse him for expenses
not recouped by the release of the unselected film. In addition, distributors
could exempt unselected films from the no cross-collateralization clause,
and offset selected film revenues from unselected film expenses that were
not recouped.
Gross Receipts. The most important term of a distribution agreement
is the definition of "gross receipts." "Gross receipts" or "film rentals"
are described as all monies received by the distributor from exhibition
and distribution. There are certain exclusions from gross receipts. Such
exclusions are distributor-owned exhibitor receipts, rebates, refunds,
adjustments that the distributor received from an exhibitor, guarantees
or advances, and any amount collected as payment for taxes from a distributor.
The "gross receipts" of each film are used to calculate net profits
and distribution fees. Fee percentages are specified for every film and
territory. The distribution fee is calculated from "adjusted gross receipts,"
or gross receipts after deduction of sales taxes and other similar taxes.
The net deal acquisition agreement allows for the distributor to deduct
a distribution fee, a percentage of the adjusted gross receipts, before
its expenses are deducted.
Major studio distributors charge about a thirty percent fee in the United
States and Canada and slightly higher rates in Europe and other territories.
If subdistributors are used by major studios in territories, then the subdistributor
will charge an "override," or an additional distribution fee percentage.
Producers should protect themselves by negotiating a cap that restricts
the aggregate fees to a specific percentage of gross receipts, such as
50 percent. For example, the Disney distribution arm may charge either
the higher of its, 1) discounted fees based on the total subdistributor’s
gross receipts for the territory, or 2) full fee based on the amount remitted
by the subdistributor after the subdistributor has taken its fee, with
the combined fee of Disney and its subdistributor not to exceed 50 percent.
On the other hand, in a "pass-through" arrangement, subdistributors may
be compensated by taking part of the fee of the distributor without tacking
on an "overide", or additional distribution fee, thus, leaving the producer
with more revenues.
Expenses. After the distribution fee is collected, distribution
expenses are then deducted from the adjusted gross receipts. Typical expenses
for all distribution agreements include collection of monies costs, print
and advertising costs, trade association fees, and insurance costs for
coverage of risk of loss. In a foreign distribution contract, expenses
such as the conversion cost of currency to American dollars, foreign version
costs of dubbing and subtitling, transportation costs, and quota losses
for distributing foreign movies required by a foreign government in order
to distribute a producer’s film are standard.
Guarantees or Advances. Also included in a percentage net deal
are the guarantees or advances paid to the producer. The guarantees or
advances are either recoupable or not by the distributor from the "gross
receipts." Advances range from ten thousand dollars for limited rights
of a less successful film in a small territory to over a million dollars
for all rights of a very successful film in a large territory.
Delivery of Film. Payment of the guarantee is triggered by the
"delivery of the film." What constitutes "delivery of the film" is a frequently
contested issue. The producer will argue that delivery to an agreed upon
film laboratory of a completed film that meets the distributor’s specified
terms will trigger payment of the minimum guarantee. On the other hand,
the distributor will want the right to inspect all materials delivered
to confirm that the material is technically acceptable or meet subjective
standards of acceptability. If and when the distributor makes the determination
of technical or subjective acceptability, the minimum guarantee will be
paid.
The producer’s position is not acceptable for the distributor because
the distributor will have to pay for defective, non-exploitable film material.
In contrast, the distributor’s position will be unacceptable to the producer
because it allows the distributor to unilaterally reject material as technically
unacceptable or worse to reject it for subjective reasons. The producer
is then left with a completed film and no foreign exploitation in the distributor’s
territory.
The ability of a producer to get a technical or subjective acceptability
standard for delivery depends largely on his or her bargaining power. The
independent producer may need the income from a certain territory regardless
of the possibility of rejection from a distributor’s subjective standard.
On the other hand, foreign distributors may compete to distribute a Hollywood
blockbuster and have more lenient terms for delivery and payment of advances
in order to get the contract.
An ideal compromise to this problem usually allows for the distributor
to inspect the film material and determine if it is technically acceptable
and if so pay the minimum guarantee. If it is not technically acceptable
then there are specified cure periods for the producer to cure all objections
identified by the distributor. Ultimately, if the parties cannot agree
then the issue is submitted to arbitration pursuant to the arbitration
clause of the contract.
Even if the amount due to the producer is clearly specified in the contract,
collection of the producer’s compensation from foreign distributors or
subdistributors may be difficult. Collection of funds should be protected
by a letter of credit, or a personal guarantee, and a protective currency
clause to adjust for fluctuating exchange rates.
Blocked Funds. Blocked funds exist when foreign governments will
not allow theses funds to be removed from the territory. Thus, parties
should provide for this contingency through contract by having the distributor
deposit the funds in a bank account in the territory under the producer’s
name. This provision will remove the distributor from the blocked funds
problem and leave the producer to get his or her money out of the territory.
Moreover, with this provision, "gross receipts" cannot be manipulated to
exclude blocked funds because these funds cannot be remitted to the producer
outside the territory.
Censorship. Censorship is another typical issue included in foreign
distribution agreements. Usually, the distributor is responsible for censorship
clearing because the distributor is in the best position to acquire such
clearances. Because many producer warranties require that the film will
not have any censorable material, producers should aim for a "best or reasonable
efforts" standard than an absolute standard. Given the wide range of censorship
standards in foreign territories, producers do not want to guarantee absolute
non-censorable material for all territories. Usually if censorship is seen
as a problem to distribution, producers may grant editing rights to distributors
to cure the problem. In most agreements, if distribution is interrupted
because of censorship problems, the producer has to reimburse the distributor
for distribution costs up to that point.
Force Majeure. The force majeure clause protects against unforeseen
liability. This clause holds neither the distributor nor the producer liable
for each other’s breaches of the contract if there is an act of God, or
war, or strike, and other circumstances out of the control of both parties.
This clause is crucial for foreign distribution agreements, in light of
the political and economic instability of some countries. In the event
of a material breach by the foreign distributor, not caused by force majeure,
the contract should provide for automatic reversion of rights to the producer.
This rights reversion will allow the producer to continued exploitation
of the film in the territory without disruption from an incompetent or
breaching distributor.
Conflict of Law. When dealing in foreign territories, resolutions
for conflict of law should be agreed upon in writing. Clauses usually state
that if there is a conflict of law between the territory’s government and
the provisions of the contract, the government’s law would prevail and
the agreement would be modified to remove such conflict but will continue
in full force once modified. This clause serves to allow uninterrupted
distribution and exploitation of a film in cases of conflicts of law.
Other Provisions. Other clauses that apply in foreign distribution
agreements are prohibition of licensing to the distributor’s affiliates
without producer approval to avoid sweetheart deals, audit rights, statute
of limitations on incontestability of financial records, choice of law
and forum clauses, and arbitration clauses.
Given the steady growth of the overseas film market and the growing
importance of the international box office, American producers and distributors
should welcome the global market. Regardless of whether a film is independent
or a major blockbuster, careful assessment of each film’s potential market
in the territory involves analysis of each territory’s social, economic
and political factors. Consideration of these factors should give you an
guideline as to what provisions to pay special attention to in the foreign
distribution contract. If the necessary assessments are made, American
filmakers should be able to reap the benefits of the international motion
pictures industry.
Author acknowledges the contributions of Donald C.
Farber, Entertainment Industry Contracts: Negotiating and Drafting Guide;
John W. Cones, The Feature Film Distribution Deal: A Critical Analysis
of the Single Most Important Film Industry Agreement; David Nochimson,
Contingent Compensation for Theatrical Motion Pictures, Entertainment,
Arts, and Sports Law; Jan D’Alessandro, A Trade Based Response to Intellectual
Property Piracy: A Comprehensive Plan to Aid the Motion Picture Industry;
Howard M. Frumes, Twelfth Annual International Symposium ‘International
Media Law In the 90's and Beyond’: Distributing Motion Pictures Around
the World: The International Nature of the Film Industry; Thomas F.R. Garvin,
Counseling Clients in the Entertainment Industry; Matthew C. Thompson,
When a Movie Goes Abroad; Triggering the Minimum Film Guarantee Obligation.
The above provisions are not exhaustive nor strictly standard provisions,
because the relative bargaining power of distributors and producers can
lead to negotiations for more favorable clauses for the party with greater
bargaining power. These provisions do not constitute legal advice,
they are given merely for informational purposes, consultation with legal
counsel is recommended before entering into any agreement.
© COPYRIGHT 2001 BLAKE & WANG, P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
|

|